Navigation: Wiki Home > Skills > Epsilon-Delta Proofs for Polynomial Functions
For linear functions, $\vert f(x) - L\vert $ was simply a constant times $\vert x - a\vert $. Quadratics are trickier: when you factor $x^2 - a^2 = (x-a)(x+a)$, you get two factors that both change as $x$ moves.
The $(x - a)$ factor is small when $x$ is near $a$—that's good. But what about $(x + a)$? If we don't control it, we can't bound the product.
The solution: first restrict $\vert x - a\vert $ to keep $(x + a)$ bounded, then choose $\delta$ to make the whole expression small. This leads to the famous $\delta = \min\{1, \varepsilon/K\}$ pattern.
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Course | MATH161 |
| Chapter.Section | 1.7 |
| Difficulty | Advanced |
| Time | ~20 minutes |
The problem: For $\lim_{x \to a} x^2 = a^2$, we have: $$\vert x^2 - a^2\vert = \vert x - a\vert \cdot \vert x + a\vert $$
The factor $\vert x - a\vert $ is what we control. But $\vert x + a\vert $ could be arbitrarily large if we don't restrict $x$.
The solution: A two-phase approach:
Final choice: $\delta = \min\{1, \varepsilon/K\}$ ensures both conditions are satisfied.
The choice $\delta = \min\{1, \varepsilon/K\}$ ensures:
If we only used $\delta = \varepsilon/K$, that could be larger than 1 when $\varepsilon$ is large, invalidating our bound. Taking the minimum covers all cases.
Goal: Prove that for every $\varepsilon > 0$, there exists $\delta > 0$ such that $0 < \vert x - 3\vert < \delta$ implies $\vert x^2 - 9\vert < \varepsilon$.
Phase 1: Bound the wandering factor
Factor: $\vert x^2 - 9\vert = \vert x - 3\vert \cdot \vert x + 3\vert $
Assume $\vert x - 3\vert < 1$. Then:
Phase 2: Make the product small
With $\vert x + 3\vert < 7$: $$\vert x^2 - 9\vert = \vert x - 3\vert \cdot \vert x + 3\vert < 7\vert x - 3\vert $$
We need $7\vert x - 3\vert < \varepsilon$, so $\vert x - 3\vert < \varepsilon/7$.
Final choice: $\delta = \min\{1, \varepsilon/7\}$
The formal proof:
Proof: Let $\varepsilon > 0$ be given. Choose $\delta = \min\{1, \varepsilon/7\}$.
Suppose $0 < \vert x - 3\vert < \delta$.
Since $\delta \leq 1$, we have $\vert x - 3\vert < 1$, which gives $2 < x < 4$, so $\vert x + 3\vert < 7$.
Then: $$\vert x^2 - 9\vert = \vert x - 3\vert \cdot \vert x + 3\vert < \vert x - 3\vert \cdot 7 < \delta \cdot 7 \leq \frac{\varepsilon}{7} \cdot 7 = \varepsilon$$
Therefore $\lim_{x \to 3} x^2 = 9$. $\square$
Assume $\vert x - a\vert < 1$:
Actually, a cleaner bound: if $\vert x - a\vert < 1$, then $\vert x\vert < \vert a\vert + 1$, so: $$\vert x + a\vert \leq \vert x\vert + \vert a\vert < (\vert a\vert + 1) + \vert a\vert = 2\vert a\vert + 1$$
Choose $\delta = \min\{1, \varepsilon/(2\vert a\vert + 1)\}$.
For $\lim_{x \to a} x^3 = a^3$, we have: $$\vert x^3 - a^3\vert = \vert x - a\vert \cdot \vert x^2 + xa + a^2\vert $$
The same technique applies:
For $\lim_{x \to 2} x^2 = 4$, we have $\vert x^2 - 4\vert = \vert x - 2\vert \vert x + 2\vert $.
If we assume $\vert x - 2\vert < 1$, what is the largest possible value of $\vert x + 2\vert $?
For $\lim_{x \to 2} x^2 = 4$, using the bound $\vert x + 2\vert < 5$ (when $\vert x - 2\vert < 1$):
Prove that $\lim_{x \to 4} x^2 = 16$ using the epsilon-delta definition.
Prove that $\lim_{x \to 2} (x^2 + x) = 6$ using the epsilon-delta definition.
(Hint: You'll need to factor $x^2 + x - 6$.)
Prove that $\lim_{x \to 1} x^3 = 1$ using the epsilon-delta definition.
(Hint: $x^3 - 1 = (x-1)(x^2 + x + 1)$)
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Factor $\|f(x) - L\|$ | Isolate $\|x - a\|$ |
| 2 | Assume $\|x - a\| < 1$ | Create a bounded interval |
| 3 | Find bound $K$ for other factors | Get $\|f(x) - L\| < K\|x - a\|$ |
| 4 | Solve $K\|x - a\| < \varepsilon$ | Get $\|x - a\| < \varepsilon/K$ |
| 5 | Choose $\delta = \min\{1, \varepsilon/K\}$ | Satisfy both constraints |
| Mistake | Why It's Wrong | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Only using $\delta = \varepsilon/K$ | May violate the $\|x - a\| < 1$ assumption | Use $\min\{1, \varepsilon/K\}$ |
| Forgetting to verify $\|x + a\| < K$ | The bound needs justification | Show the derivation in your proof |
| Wrong interval for $x$ | $\|x - a\| < 1$ means $a - 1 < x < a + 1$ | Be careful with the algebra |
| Taking 1 arbitrarily | Any positive initial bound works | Could use $\min\{2, ...\}$ instead |
The Two-Step Dance:
Think of epsilon-delta proofs for polynomials as a negotiation:
Looking back:
Looking ahead:
| Previous | Up | Next |
|---|---|---|
| Epsilon-Delta Proofs: Linear | Skills Index | Epsilon-Delta Variations |
Last updated: 2026-01-22