← MathScape

Shell Method: Rotation About the y-axis

MATH162
Reference: Stewart 5.3  •  Chapter: 5  •  Section: 3

Navigation: Wiki Home > Skills > Shell Method: y-axis

Shell Method: Rotation About the y-axis

Quick Reference $$\boxed{V = \int_a^b 2\pi x f(x) \, dx}$$

Component Meaning
$x$ Radius (distance from strip to $y$-axis)
$f(x)$ Height (length of vertical strip)
$dx$ Thickness
$2\pi x$ Circumference of the shell

Before You Start

1. Can you identify the radius, height, and thickness from a shell formula setup?

In $V = 2\pi r h \Delta r$:

  • $r$ = radius (distance to axis)
  • $h$ = height (length of strip)
  • $\Delta r$ = thickness

If this is unclear, review Shell Method Formula.

2. Can you find where $y = x^2$ and $y = 2x$ intersect?

Solution: Set $x^2 = 2x$, so $x^2 - 2x = 0$, giving $x(x - 2) = 0$. Thus $x = 0$ or $x = 2$.

If this was difficult, you'll struggle with bounds for shell integrals. Review solving systems of equations.

3. Can you evaluate $\int_0^2 x^{3/2} \, dx$?

Solution: $\left[\frac{x^{5/2}}{5/2}\right]_0^2 = \frac{2}{5} \cdot 2^{5/2} = \frac{2}{5} \cdot 4\sqrt{2} = \frac{8\sqrt{2}}{5}$

If fractional exponents feel unfamiliar, review Power Rule Integration.

The Standard Case

Rotation about the $y$-axis is the natural habitat for the shell method. When a region defined by $y = f(x)$ rotates about the $y$-axis, vertical strips become cylindrical shells in a direct way:

This is often simpler than the disk/washer method, which would require solving $y = f(x)$ for $x$—impossible or painful when $f$ is a cubic or worse.

Prerequisite Map

This skill
Shell Method: y-axis

Quick Reference

Property Value
Chapter 5 - Applications of Integration
Section 5.3
Difficulty Intermediate
Time ~20 minutes
Scenario Shell Formula
Region under $y = f(x)$ $V = \int_a^b 2\pi x f(x) \, dx$
Region between $y = f(x)$ and $y = g(x)$ $V = \int_a^b 2\pi x [f(x) - g(x)] \, dx$

Key Concepts

The Standard Formula

For a region bounded by $y = f(x)$ (where $f(x) \geq 0$), $y = 0$, $x = a$, and $x = b$ (with $0 \leq a < b$), rotated about the y-axis:

$$\boxed{V = \int_a^b 2\pi x f(x) \, dx}$$

Understanding Each Part

Component What It Represents In the Formula
Radius Distance from $y$-axis to strip $x$
Height Length of vertical strip $f(x)$
Thickness Width of strip $dx$
Circumference Perimeter of circular cross-section $2\pi x$

Step-by-Step Process

Step 1: Sketch the region and identify the bounds on $x$.

Step 2: Draw a typical vertical strip at position $x$.

Step 3: Identify the shell components:

Step 4: Write the integral: $$V = \int_a^b 2\pi \cdot (\text{radius}) \cdot (\text{height}) \, dx$$

Step 5: Simplify the integrand before integrating.

Step 6: Evaluate the definite integral.

Step 7: Verify (optional but recommended): Check dimensions or compare with another method.

Visualizing the Setup

y
│         ╭───────╮
│       ╱         │
│     ╱     f(x)  │ ← height of shell = f(x)
│   ╱             │
│ ╱───────────────┤
├─────┬───────────┼─── x
0     a     x     b

     ↑
     └── radius of shell = x (distance to y-axis)

When this strip rotates around the y-axis,
it sweeps out a cylindrical shell.

Region Between Two Curves

When the region is between $y = g(x)$ (bottom) and $y = f(x)$ (top):

$$V = \int_a^b 2\pi x [f(x) - g(x)] \, dx$$

The height of each shell is the vertical distance between the curves.

y
│       ╭─── f(x) (top curve)
│     ╱
│   ╱     ↕ height = f(x) - g(x)
│ ╱
│ ╲─────── g(x) (bottom curve)
├─────────────────── x
0    a    x    b
📜 Historical Note: Why Shells Matter

The shell method was developed because many natural shapes—like solids formed by rotating cubics such as $y = x^3 - x^2 + x$—lead to equations that are impractical to solve when using the disk method. Before computer algebra systems, mathematicians needed methods that worked with the "natural" description of a region. The shell method lets you work with $y = f(x)$ directly, without solving for $x = f^{-1}(y)$.

Practice Problems

Level 1 Direct Application

Find the volume of the solid obtained by rotating the region under $y = x^2$ from $x = 0$ to $x = 3$ about the $y$-axis.

Thought Process

Why this is a good starting problem: All components are given directly—no intersection points to find, no "which curve is on top" to determine.

Mental checklist:

  1. ✓ Region is under a single curve $y = x^2$
  2. ✓ Bounds are given: $x \in [0, 3]$
  3. ✓ Rotating about $y$-axis → use $V = \int 2\pi x f(x) \, dx$

Strategy: Substitute $f(x) = x^2$, set up the integral, and evaluate using the power rule.

Anticipating the algebra: $x \cdot x^2 = x^3$, so we'll integrate $x^3$.

Show Answer

Using $V = \int_a^b 2\pi x f(x) \, dx$:

Identify components:

  • Radius: $x$
  • Height: $x^2$
  • Bounds: $x$ from 0 to 3

Set up integral: $$V = \int_0^3 2\pi x \cdot x^2 \, dx = 2\pi \int_0^3 x^3 \, dx$$

Evaluate: $$= 2\pi \left[\frac{x^4}{4}\right]_0^3 = 2\pi \cdot \frac{81}{4} = \frac{81\pi}{2}$$

Quick check: The volume is positive and has the form (constant)$\cdot \pi$, which is expected for a solid of revolution.

Level 2 Finding the Bounds

Find the volume of the solid obtained by rotating the region bounded by $y = 3x - x^3$ and $y = 0$ (for $x \geq 0$) about the $y$-axis.

Thought Process

The new challenge: Bounds aren't given directly—we need to find where $y = 3x - x^3$ intersects $y = 0$.

Strategy:

  1. Solve $3x - x^3 = 0$ to find $x$-intercepts
  2. Determine which portion is above the $x$-axis (for $x \geq 0$)
  3. Set up and evaluate the shell integral

Factoring insight: $3x - x^3 = x(3 - x^2) = x(\sqrt{3} - x)(\sqrt{3} + x)$

For $x \geq 0$: Roots are at $x = 0$ and $x = \sqrt{3}$

Show Answer

Find bounds: $$3x - x^3 = 0 \implies x(3 - x^2) = 0$$

For $x \geq 0$: $x = 0$ or $x = \sqrt{3}$

Check the function is positive: At $x = 1$: $y = 3(1) - 1^3 = 2 > 0$ ✓

Set up integral: $$V = \int_0^{\sqrt{3}} 2\pi x (3x - x^3) \, dx = 2\pi \int_0^{\sqrt{3}} (3x^2 - x^4) \, dx$$

Evaluate: $$= 2\pi \left[x^3 - \frac{x^5}{5}\right]_0^{\sqrt{3}}$$

At $x = \sqrt{3}$:

  • $(\sqrt{3})^3 = 3\sqrt{3}$
  • $(\sqrt{3})^5 = 9\sqrt{3}$

$$= 2\pi \left(3\sqrt{3} - \frac{9\sqrt{3}}{5}\right) = 2\pi \cdot \sqrt{3}\left(3 - \frac{9}{5}\right)$$

$$= 2\pi\sqrt{3} \cdot \frac{15 - 9}{5} = 2\pi\sqrt{3} \cdot \frac{6}{5} = \frac{12\sqrt{3}\pi}{5}$$

Level 3 Region Between Curves

Find the volume of the solid obtained by rotating about the $y$-axis the region bounded by $y = 2x$ and $y = x^2$.

Thought Process

The key questions:

  1. Where do the curves intersect? (These give the bounds)
  2. Which curve is on top? (This determines the height formula)

Finding intersections: Set $2x = x^2$, solve for $x$.

Determining top/bottom: Test a point between the intersections.

Shell height: For a region between two curves, height = (top) − (bottom).

Why this matters: If you subtract in the wrong order, you'll get a negative volume—a clear error signal.

Show Answer

Find intersections: $$2x = x^2 \implies x^2 - 2x = 0 \implies x(x-2) = 0$$ $$x = 0 \text{ or } x = 2$$

Which is on top? At $x = 1$:

  • Line: $y = 2(1) = 2$
  • Parabola: $y = 1^2 = 1$

The line $y = 2x$ is above the parabola $y = x^2$ on $[0, 2]$.

Set up integral: $$V = \int_0^2 2\pi x (2x - x^2) \, dx = 2\pi \int_0^2 (2x^2 - x^3) \, dx$$

Evaluate: $$= 2\pi \left[\frac{2x^3}{3} - \frac{x^4}{4}\right]_0^2$$

$$= 2\pi \left(\frac{2(8)}{3} - \frac{16}{4}\right) = 2\pi \left(\frac{16}{3} - 4\right)$$

$$= 2\pi \left(\frac{16 - 12}{3}\right) = 2\pi \cdot \frac{4}{3} = \frac{8\pi}{3}$$

Verification: This is a finite positive volume, which is correct for a bounded region.

Level 4 When Shells Are Essential

Find the volume of the solid obtained by rotating about the $y$-axis the region bounded by $y = 3x^2 - x^3$ and $y = 0$.

Thought Process

Why this problem demonstrates shell superiority: Using washers would require solving $y = 3x^2 - x^3$ for $x$ in terms of $y$—a cubic equation with no elementary solution. The shell method sidesteps this entirely.

Strategy:

  1. Factor $3x^2 - x^3 = x^2(3 - x)$ to find roots
  2. Confirm the function is non-negative between roots
  3. Apply the shell formula directly

Expert insight: When you see a cubic like $x^2(3-x)$, recognize that solving for $x$ requires the cubic formula—messy and error-prone. The shell method lets you integrate with respect to $x$ directly.

Show Answer

Find bounds: $$3x^2 - x^3 = x^2(3 - x) = 0$$ $x = 0$ (double root) or $x = 3$

For $0 \leq x \leq 3$, we have $3 - x \geq 0$, so the function is non-negative.

Set up integral: $$V = \int_0^3 2\pi x (3x^2 - x^3) \, dx = 2\pi \int_0^3 (3x^3 - x^4) \, dx$$

Evaluate: $$= 2\pi \left[\frac{3x^4}{4} - \frac{x^5}{5}\right]_0^3$$

At $x = 3$: $\frac{3(81)}{4} - \frac{243}{5} = \frac{243}{4} - \frac{243}{5} = 243\left(\frac{1}{4} - \frac{1}{5}\right) = 243 \cdot \frac{1}{20} = \frac{243}{20}$

$$V = 2\pi \cdot \frac{243}{20} = \frac{243\pi}{10}$$

Why shells were essential: Trying to use washers would require solving $y = 3x^2 - x^3$ for $x$, which means applying the cubic formula—a formula most students don't memorize. The shell method keeps everything in terms of $x$, yielding a straightforward polynomial integral.

Level 5 Comparing Methods

Consider the region bounded by $y = \sqrt{x}$, $y = 0$, and $x = 4$, rotated about the $y$-axis.

  1. Set up the volume integral using the shell method.
  2. Set up the volume integral using the disk/washer method.
  3. Evaluate both integrals and verify they give the same answer.
  4. Discuss which method required fewer steps for this problem.
Thought Process

Purpose of this problem: To see both methods in action and understand that they're just different approaches to the same volume.

For shells: Vertical strips rotate into shells. Radius = $x$, height = $\sqrt{x}$, integrate with $dx$.

For washers: Horizontal slices become washers. We need $x$ as a function of $y$: from $y = \sqrt{x}$, we get $x = y^2$. Outer radius = 4, inner radius = $y^2$, integrate with $dy$. Bounds become $y \in [0, 2]$.

Why this comparison works: $y = \sqrt{x}$ is easy to invert to $x = y^2$, so both methods are tractable. For functions that are hard to invert, shells would be the clear winner.

Show Answer

(a) Shell method:

Vertical strip at $x$ has:

  • Radius: $x$
  • Height: $\sqrt{x}$
  • Bounds: $x \in [0, 4]$

$$V_{\text{shell}} = \int_0^4 2\pi x \sqrt{x} \, dx = 2\pi \int_0^4 x^{3/2} \, dx$$

(b) Washer method:

Horizontal slice at height $y$:

  • Solving $y = \sqrt{x}$ gives $x = y^2$
  • Outer radius: $4$ (from the line $x = 4$)
  • Inner radius: $y^2$ (from the curve $x = y^2$)
  • Bounds: $y \in [0, 2]$ (since $\sqrt{4} = 2$)

$$V_{\text{washer}} = \int_0^2 \pi(4^2 - (y^2)^2) \, dy = \pi \int_0^2 (16 - y^4) \, dy$$

(c) Evaluate both:

Shells: $$2\pi \int_0^4 x^{3/2} \, dx = 2\pi \left[\frac{x^{5/2}}{5/2}\right]_0^4 = 2\pi \cdot \frac{2}{5} \cdot 4^{5/2}$$

Since $4^{5/2} = (4^{1/2})^5 = 2^5 = 32$: $$= 2\pi \cdot \frac{2}{5} \cdot 32 = \frac{128\pi}{5}$$

Washers: $$\pi \int_0^2 (16 - y^4) \, dy = \pi \left[16y - \frac{y^5}{5}\right]_0^2$$ $$= \pi \left(32 - \frac{32}{5}\right) = \pi \cdot \frac{160 - 32}{5} = \frac{128\pi}{5}$$

Both methods give $V = \frac{128\pi}{5}$ ✓

(d) Comparison:

Aspect Shells Washers
Integrand $x^{3/2}$ (one term) $16 - y^4$ (two terms)
Bounds Given directly Required solving $\sqrt{4} = 2$
Setup More direct Required inverting $y = \sqrt{x}$

Verdict: Shells were slightly easier here because we didn't need to solve for $x = y^2$ or convert the bounds. For this problem, the difference is small. But if the function were harder to invert (like $y = x + \sin x$), shells would be the only practical choice.

Common Mistakes

Mistake Why It Happens Correction
Using $2\pi f(x)$ as radius Confusing radius with height Radius is $x$ (distance to axis), height is $f(x)$.
Forgetting the $2\pi$ Rushed setup or mixing with disk method Always write out: circumference × height × thickness = $2\pi x \cdot f(x) \cdot dx$.
Wrong bounds (using $y$-values) Mixing up integration variables When integrating with $dx$, bounds are $x$-values.
Height as $(f(x))^2$ Confusing with the disk method The disk method squares the radius; the shell method doesn't square the height.
Subtracting curves in wrong order Not checking which is "on top" Test a point between intersections to see which $y$-value is larger.

Still Confused?

Mastery Checklist

Looking Ahead

You've mastered the standard case. Next, we generalize:

Mental Model

The Vertical Strip Wrap:

Picture taking a tall, thin strip of paper and wrapping it around a pole (the $y$-axis). The distance from the strip to the pole is the radius, the strip's length is the height, and its width is the thickness. Sum up infinitely many such wrapped strips to get the solid.

When $y = f(x)$ is complicated, this "wrap around the axis" approach beats having to unwrap and re-describe the curves in terms of $y$.

Previous Up Next
Shell Method Formula Section 5.3 Shell Method: Other Axes

Last updated: 2026-01-23